By definition an Erdős number, honouring the late Hungarian mathematician Paul Erdős [1], is a way of describing the “collaborative distance” between a person and Erdős, as measured by authorship of mathematical papers. [2]
Lately The web Comic XKCD made a comic named Apocalypse [3], as doom day approaches dead people rises from their graves. And some mathematitions write a paper and signs for co-authership with honourable living dead Paul Erdős. Waiting at his grave to make him sign the paper.
Later on Danah Boyd [4] a researcher at Microsoft Research at New England wrote a blog named XKCD meets real [5]. Mentioning about an email she got from her friend named Henry Cohn[6] about a paper named “Higher algebraic K-theory of schemes and of derived categories” co-authored by R. W. Thomason and Thomas Trobaugh. The thing is at this paper being written, Thomas Trobaugh was deceased and R. W. Thomason says Mr. Trobaugh gave a start on the paper.
As written at the blog:
By the way, there’s no need to wait until the end times to write papers with dead mathematicians. One example of this is the paper “Higher algebraic K-theory of schemes and of derived categories” by R. W. Thomason and Thomas Trobaugh, which Thomason wrote with his deceased friend Trobaugh after Trobaugh appeared to him in a dream:
“The first author must state that his coauthor and close friend, Tom Trobaugh, quite intelligent, singularly original, and inordinately generous, killed himself consequent to endogenous depression. Ninety-four days later, in my dream, Tom’s simulacrum remarked, ‘The direct limit characterization of perfect complexes shows that they extend, just as one extends a coherent sheaf.’ Awaking with a start, I knew this idea had to be wrong, since some perfect complexes have a non-vanishing K_0 obstruction to extension. I had worked on this problem for 3 years, and saw this approach to be hopeless. But Tom’s simulacrum had been so insistent, I knew he wouldn’t let me sleep undisturbed until I had worked out the argument and could point to the gap. This work quickly led to the key results of this paper. To Tom, I could have explained why he must be listed as a coauthor.”
So I’ve came with an idea of “Imaginary Erdős Number or Trobaugh Number”. By my definition an Imaginary Erdős Number is a way of describing the “collaborative imaginary distance” between a person and Erdős’s simulacrum as he appears in one’s dream, as measured by authorship of mathematical papers. [2]
To be assigned an Imaginary Erdős number, an author must co-write a mathematical paper with an author with a finite imaginary Erdős number. Paul Erdős having 0+i0 imaginary Erdős number, and author having written a paper with Paul Erdős’s dream image has 0+1i Imaginary Erdős number. A person co-authoring a paper with dream image of a person having an Imaginary Erdős number 0+ni, has an Imaginary Erdős number 0 + (n+1)i. The co-author with the Imaginary Erdős number can be alive or deceased. People being out of the chain has an Imaginary Erdős number of 0+∞i
[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Erd%C5%91s
[2]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erdos_number
[3]http://xkcd.com/599/
[4]http://www.danah.org/
[5]http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2009/06/21/xkcd_meets_real.html
[6]http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/cohn/
1. Yorum , John
24/Haz/2009 , 6:22 pm
Note that one may write multiple papers with different co-authors and therefore have potentially multiple “Erdős numbers”. One should therefore choose the smallest potential number (in this case the smallest Re() and Im() parts) for one’s official Erdős number.
Once upon a time I had Erdős number 3 and then my co-author co-authored a paper with The Man, dropping my Erdős number down to 2.