On Simulation-Reality Prediction yazısına yapılan yorumlar

Yazar: Hasan Ozgan

Hasan Ozgan — Tue, 19 May 2009 22:29:48 +0000

Tek Gözlü Devlerin Yönettiği, Ütopik Fısıltılar Korosu – http://kissa.be/3Aj

Yazar: Tek Gözlü Devlerin Planladığı, Ütopya Fısıltılar at Hasan Ozgan’s Weblog

Tek Gözlü Devlerin Planladığı, Ütopya Fısıltılar at Hasan Ozgan’s Weblog — Tue, 19 May 2009 22:16:35 +0000

[...] sohbetimizin en dikkat çeken tarafı, blog@yalazi üzerinde bulunan, “On Simulation-Reality Prediction” başlıklı yazısı. Yazı [...]

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment’s actual post text did not contain your blog url (http://www.yalazi.org/index.php/archives/2009/05/18/on-simulation-reality-prediction) and so is spam.

Yazar: Onur YALAZI

Onur YALAZI — Tue, 19 May 2009 07:27:29 +0000

Traveling in time is not a problem here. If you can wait enough and collect data, you can derive an fd
(n) in the future. Also It’s possible to use negative Vs (So it’s no more called a Vs, now SimulationSpeed
– Ss it’s vectoral from now on.) and use collected data from the past.

About randomization approaches.. We’re supposing we have simulated in a really accurate manner. So you
also stating there is a differential about our randomization approach and reality randomization. If
so we have a dRa factor in fd(n).

what else should we use in fd(n) derivation?

Yazar: N. Can KIRIK

N. Can KIRIK — Mon, 18 May 2009 23:53:10 +0000

did you watch one of sandler’s movie that called “Click”?

if not, you should. there is a partial answer to your question in the movie.

by the way you cant calculate a fd(n) value.

simulations are based on randomization approachs. but on the other hand, real life (relative to us) is
based on randomization’s itself, not on approachs.

so, you are not able to examine fd(n) value where n is a future time. because you cannot foresee a (Ro
+n) origin (where you cannot travel in time – and this is another subject to discuss)

uzun lafın kısası olmaz kardeşim